<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for </title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gmsmagazine.com/comments/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gmsmagazine.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 19:51:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Test of Fire: Bull Run 1861 by Charlotte</title>
		<link>http://www.gmsmagazine.com/board_games/test-of-fire-bull-run-1861#comment-87526</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlotte</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 19:51:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gmsmagazine.com/board_games/test-of-fire-bull-run-1861#comment-87526</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Spot on with this write-up, I absolutely 
believe this web site needs a great deal more attention.
I&#039;ll probably be returning to see more, thanks for the info!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spot on with this write-up, I absolutely<br />
believe this web site needs a great deal more attention.<br />
I&#8217;ll probably be returning to see more, thanks for the info!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The G*M*S Magazine Podcast Episode 99&#8211;Game Knights with Javier Palenzuela by Dr. Mike Reddy</title>
		<link>http://www.gmsmagazine.com/podcasts/the-gms-magazine-podcast-episode-99game-knights-with-javier-palenzuela#comment-82758</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Mike Reddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 08:08:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gmsmagazine.com/?p=12361#comment-82758</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pilot of Game Knight here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&amp;v=MIDeP76ZjuA]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pilot of Game Knight here: <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&#038;v=MIDeP76ZjuA" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&#038;v=MIDeP76ZjuA</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why Games Workshop is not a good business by Truthsayer</title>
		<link>http://www.gmsmagazine.com/articles/why-games-workshop-is-not-a-good-business#comment-79269</link>
		<dc:creator>Truthsayer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 21:31:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gmsmagazine.com/?p=7394#comment-79269</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So someone asks you to clarify your figures - to back them up with hard data - and it classifies me as a troll?  

This is the first time I have posted on the website (as I said in my original post). You make a number of points that are unclear or that are unfair to say without something a little more substantial than the experiences of a single person. 

Maybe my tone was overly confrontational and hence you classified me &#039;troll&#039; - but I think a number of GW employees might feel the same about your comments regarding them, so I don&#039;t feel too apologetic for it. 

If you are going to found something like GMS and go on record stating things like this, the least you can do is back up what you say with figures. Otherwise, I have to ask who the real troll is.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So someone asks you to clarify your figures &#8211; to back them up with hard data &#8211; and it classifies me as a troll?  </p>
<p>This is the first time I have posted on the website (as I said in my original post). You make a number of points that are unclear or that are unfair to say without something a little more substantial than the experiences of a single person. </p>
<p>Maybe my tone was overly confrontational and hence you classified me &#8216;troll&#8217; &#8211; but I think a number of GW employees might feel the same about your comments regarding them, so I don&#8217;t feel too apologetic for it. </p>
<p>If you are going to found something like GMS and go on record stating things like this, the least you can do is back up what you say with figures. Otherwise, I have to ask who the real troll is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why Games Workshop is not a good business by Paco G. Jaen</title>
		<link>http://www.gmsmagazine.com/articles/why-games-workshop-is-not-a-good-business#comment-79236</link>
		<dc:creator>Paco G. Jaen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 18:08:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gmsmagazine.com/?p=7394#comment-79236</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just to let you know, I have seen and read your reply.

This time I will not engage with you. Your comment is trollish and I have spent more than enough time dealing with the likes of you in the past. I think also *with* you in the past. And I am bored with you.

I will leave the &quot;comment&quot; on the site because, unlike other websites whose owners get offended at the slightest sign of opposition, I believe in freedom of speech, but I will not reply.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just to let you know, I have seen and read your reply.</p>
<p>This time I will not engage with you. Your comment is trollish and I have spent more than enough time dealing with the likes of you in the past. I think also *with* you in the past. And I am bored with you.</p>
<p>I will leave the &#8220;comment&#8221; on the site because, unlike other websites whose owners get offended at the slightest sign of opposition, I believe in freedom of speech, but I will not reply.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why Games Workshop is not a good business by Truthsayer</title>
		<link>http://www.gmsmagazine.com/articles/why-games-workshop-is-not-a-good-business#comment-79015</link>
		<dc:creator>Truthsayer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 May 2013 20:54:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gmsmagazine.com/?p=7394#comment-79015</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There seems to be an awful lot of text with very little substance here.  What there is, is very poorly researched and seem to be off the back of a few bad experiences.  

How can I qualify &#039;very badly researched&#039;?  Easy.  Take a look at GW&#039;s last financial report (2011-2012), which is freely available on the web, and two numbers stand out.  Their revenue for that period was £131M, yet pre-tax profits (thats PRE-tax, folks) was only £19.5M.  That tiny, two minute piece of research would have slammed the &#039;Oh my god, GW sell everything at 2000% profit&#039; assumption - even if you did only use it as a guideline.  You and I both know you were setting the tone against their company just by mentioning it.  

I don&#039;t fully know what training GW staff get.  I do, however, know that one of their ten commandments is &#039;advise the customer what they need but sell them what they want&#039;.  That&#039;s the whole commandment. No financial caveat.  So if a customer needs a rulebook, but wants a pot of paint, that&#039;s what the company is telling them to buy.  Hardly sounds like your assertion that they are all &#039;selling drones&#039;.  More like you had a conversation with a disgruntled ex-employee (for the record, I have never been to a friendly Game store; actually to the point where I just don&#039;t bother with them any more).  

Your comments about Games Workshop not talking about other games are just absurd.  I don&#039;t walk into an Audi garage and talk about BMW&#039;s because that&#039;s... well... stupid.  Yes, the staff are there to stoke your enthusiasm.  Yes, they are there to listen to you bang on and give a turn-by-turn, phase-by-phase account of the last three games you played.  But they still have a purpose, and that purpose isn&#039;t to talk about games they don&#039;t sell.  Because, frankly, the store isn&#039;t the place for it, unless you are a hobbyist who actually doesn&#039;t bother to get off their arse and find a local Games Club.  They&#039;ll let you talk about whatever the hell you want.  And you can probably drink beer whilst you do so.  

I&#039;m interested to see that you think they don&#039;t sell anything other than LOTR, 40K and WFB.  Last I checked, everything they still made was available on the GW website.  And no, when they don&#039;t even have space for all their blister pack models for their most popular ranges, I would be very surprised to see other games sat on their shelves.  If you&#039;re wanting new releases and expansions all the time, then frankly you&#039;re being a little shortsighted again.  Even with Every month sporting a 40K or Fantasy release (and then take one month for the new Hobbit films), that means 5 releases for one system and six for the other.  There are 15 WFB armies and 15 40K armies just listed on their site, meaning it would take almost 3 years of near constant releases just to bring them up to date for whichever edition each is in now.  And you want them to release other stuff too?  You claim that there are drones who unquestioningly follow GW; I would state you are one.  Why aren&#039;t youy finding new stuff to do with each of these games.  Its not like you&#039;re lacking for resource material - unless there is an underlying phobia of research, and not just for this article.  The &#039;may I interest you in this&#039; principle IS being used, just the other way around (I&#039;ve had a fair few conversations about specialist games on recent visits to various GWs).  It&#039;s a shame if that&#039;s not happening exactly in the order you like, but it is still happening.  

The spotty kids thing is a lovely diatribe that goes nowhere; again, you seem to be basing this on a bad experience in your local area and nothing concrete.  And no, my friend, I guess they won&#039;t sympathise with you if you&#039;re taking even a tenth of the negativity present in this post into the store with you.  I&#039;m just a hobbyist too, and it wound me up to the point I penned this response. 

It&#039;s telling, however, that you talk about going online.  GW stuff online, even from other websites, still is made by, and proceeds go to GW.  So what are you trying to prove, other than still buying their stuff? 

How do you know producing plastic miniatures is getting cheaper.  There is zero evidence to back it up (other than &#039;you heard from someone&#039;).  I had a long chat with someone who is involved in quality controlling the metal parts cast by BAE systems (that&#039;s right, the Defence Contractor) who had stated that the &#039;state of the art&#039; casting principles they had just last year adopted, had be being used by GW for a good few years prior in their plastic range.  Doesn&#039;t sound cheap, does it.  Back it up with hard evidence, or leave it out.  

After this, you climb so high up on your soap box, it&#039;s hard to figure out what point you&#039;re making.  What &#039;formula&#039; are GW peddling? What PROOF do you have that they don&#039;t care about games and gamers (their games are, as far as I can tell, hands down the best out there) and a lot of gamers I know are so short sighted in a business sense, I for one am GLAD GW take complaints and suggestions with a large pinch of salt.  

Apologies for the delay in posting, I have only just found this post over the weekend when doing my own research into the company (on a whim, I might add, not to bash for fun).  It just appears that you are one of the 5000 gamers or so that populate various forums and somehow think we are the core of the hobby - the truth, my friend, couldn&#039;t be more different.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There seems to be an awful lot of text with very little substance here.  What there is, is very poorly researched and seem to be off the back of a few bad experiences.  </p>
<p>How can I qualify &#8216;very badly researched&#8217;?  Easy.  Take a look at GW&#8217;s last financial report (2011-2012), which is freely available on the web, and two numbers stand out.  Their revenue for that period was £131M, yet pre-tax profits (thats PRE-tax, folks) was only £19.5M.  That tiny, two minute piece of research would have slammed the &#8216;Oh my god, GW sell everything at 2000% profit&#8217; assumption &#8211; even if you did only use it as a guideline.  You and I both know you were setting the tone against their company just by mentioning it.  </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t fully know what training GW staff get.  I do, however, know that one of their ten commandments is &#8216;advise the customer what they need but sell them what they want&#8217;.  That&#8217;s the whole commandment. No financial caveat.  So if a customer needs a rulebook, but wants a pot of paint, that&#8217;s what the company is telling them to buy.  Hardly sounds like your assertion that they are all &#8216;selling drones&#8217;.  More like you had a conversation with a disgruntled ex-employee (for the record, I have never been to a friendly Game store; actually to the point where I just don&#8217;t bother with them any more).  </p>
<p>Your comments about Games Workshop not talking about other games are just absurd.  I don&#8217;t walk into an Audi garage and talk about BMW&#8217;s because that&#8217;s&#8230; well&#8230; stupid.  Yes, the staff are there to stoke your enthusiasm.  Yes, they are there to listen to you bang on and give a turn-by-turn, phase-by-phase account of the last three games you played.  But they still have a purpose, and that purpose isn&#8217;t to talk about games they don&#8217;t sell.  Because, frankly, the store isn&#8217;t the place for it, unless you are a hobbyist who actually doesn&#8217;t bother to get off their arse and find a local Games Club.  They&#8217;ll let you talk about whatever the hell you want.  And you can probably drink beer whilst you do so.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m interested to see that you think they don&#8217;t sell anything other than LOTR, 40K and WFB.  Last I checked, everything they still made was available on the GW website.  And no, when they don&#8217;t even have space for all their blister pack models for their most popular ranges, I would be very surprised to see other games sat on their shelves.  If you&#8217;re wanting new releases and expansions all the time, then frankly you&#8217;re being a little shortsighted again.  Even with Every month sporting a 40K or Fantasy release (and then take one month for the new Hobbit films), that means 5 releases for one system and six for the other.  There are 15 WFB armies and 15 40K armies just listed on their site, meaning it would take almost 3 years of near constant releases just to bring them up to date for whichever edition each is in now.  And you want them to release other stuff too?  You claim that there are drones who unquestioningly follow GW; I would state you are one.  Why aren&#8217;t youy finding new stuff to do with each of these games.  Its not like you&#8217;re lacking for resource material &#8211; unless there is an underlying phobia of research, and not just for this article.  The &#8216;may I interest you in this&#8217; principle IS being used, just the other way around (I&#8217;ve had a fair few conversations about specialist games on recent visits to various GWs).  It&#8217;s a shame if that&#8217;s not happening exactly in the order you like, but it is still happening.  </p>
<p>The spotty kids thing is a lovely diatribe that goes nowhere; again, you seem to be basing this on a bad experience in your local area and nothing concrete.  And no, my friend, I guess they won&#8217;t sympathise with you if you&#8217;re taking even a tenth of the negativity present in this post into the store with you.  I&#8217;m just a hobbyist too, and it wound me up to the point I penned this response. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s telling, however, that you talk about going online.  GW stuff online, even from other websites, still is made by, and proceeds go to GW.  So what are you trying to prove, other than still buying their stuff? </p>
<p>How do you know producing plastic miniatures is getting cheaper.  There is zero evidence to back it up (other than &#8216;you heard from someone&#8217;).  I had a long chat with someone who is involved in quality controlling the metal parts cast by BAE systems (that&#8217;s right, the Defence Contractor) who had stated that the &#8216;state of the art&#8217; casting principles they had just last year adopted, had be being used by GW for a good few years prior in their plastic range.  Doesn&#8217;t sound cheap, does it.  Back it up with hard evidence, or leave it out.  </p>
<p>After this, you climb so high up on your soap box, it&#8217;s hard to figure out what point you&#8217;re making.  What &#8216;formula&#8217; are GW peddling? What PROOF do you have that they don&#8217;t care about games and gamers (their games are, as far as I can tell, hands down the best out there) and a lot of gamers I know are so short sighted in a business sense, I for one am GLAD GW take complaints and suggestions with a large pinch of salt.  </p>
<p>Apologies for the delay in posting, I have only just found this post over the weekend when doing my own research into the company (on a whim, I might add, not to bash for fun).  It just appears that you are one of the 5000 gamers or so that populate various forums and somehow think we are the core of the hobby &#8211; the truth, my friend, couldn&#8217;t be more different.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Game of Thrones LCG exhaustive review by Ted Phrosby</title>
		<link>http://www.gmsmagazine.com/card-games/a-game-of-thrones-lcg-exhaustive-review#comment-71781</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted Phrosby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2013 19:15:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gmsmagazine.com/card-games/a-game-of-thrones-lcg-exhaustive-review#comment-71781</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[try teamcovenant.com 
they have several of the cards for sale individually and also sell house packs so you can buy just the cards from one house from a cycle of battle packs or even the core set.  hope this helps.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>try teamcovenant.com<br />
they have several of the cards for sale individually and also sell house packs so you can buy just the cards from one house from a cycle of battle packs or even the core set.  hope this helps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The G*M*S Magazine Podcast Episode 89&#8211;La Puerta de Ishtar, how much is too much detail and Gygax Magazine by Corvus Stone</title>
		<link>http://www.gmsmagazine.com/podcasts/the-gms-magazine-podcast-episode-89la-puerta-de-ishtar-how-much-is-too-much-detail-and-gygax-magazine#comment-70690</link>
		<dc:creator>Corvus Stone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Apr 2013 23:42:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gmsmagazine.com/?p=11989#comment-70690</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was suggested this web site by my cousin. I am not sure whether 
this post is written by him as nobody else know such 
detailed about my trouble. You are incredible! Thanks!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was suggested this web site by my cousin. I am not sure whether<br />
this post is written by him as nobody else know such<br />
detailed about my trouble. You are incredible! Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Not sure I want to be a geek anymore&#8230; by Pablo Ruiz</title>
		<link>http://www.gmsmagazine.com/articles/not-sure-i-want-to-be-a-geek-anymore#comment-68243</link>
		<dc:creator>Pablo Ruiz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Apr 2013 16:10:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gmsmagazine.com/?p=11995#comment-68243</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I use the geek label to promote the goodness of it. In Spain, it&#039;s fashionable to say you&#039;re a freak (friki) but I really despise that term and, thus, I instead push the term geek forward. It&#039;s similar to saying you&#039;re a sceptic. It means something positive, not just a condition (being gay). You can twist it (geek as a freak or sceptic as in paranoid) but it&#039;s worth the battle. I haven&#039;t reached your dilemma yet so I&#039;m happy to consider myself a geek (and a skeptic, and an open source guy, and a CEO, and a rpgamer...)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use the geek label to promote the goodness of it. In Spain, it&#8217;s fashionable to say you&#8217;re a freak (friki) but I really despise that term and, thus, I instead push the term geek forward. It&#8217;s similar to saying you&#8217;re a sceptic. It means something positive, not just a condition (being gay). You can twist it (geek as a freak or sceptic as in paranoid) but it&#8217;s worth the battle. I haven&#8217;t reached your dilemma yet so I&#8217;m happy to consider myself a geek (and a skeptic, and an open source guy, and a CEO, and a rpgamer&#8230;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Dungeon Command &#8211; Curse of Undeath by mouse mats</title>
		<link>http://www.gmsmagazine.com/board_games/dungeon-command-curse-of-undeath#comment-67720</link>
		<dc:creator>mouse mats</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2013 20:40:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gmsmagazine.com/?p=10560#comment-67720</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I constantly spent my half an hour to read this web site&#039;s articles or reviews everyday along with a mug of coffee.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I constantly spent my half an hour to read this web site&#8217;s articles or reviews everyday along with a mug of coffee.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Some of my Favorite Games by Dr. Mike Reddy</title>
		<link>http://www.gmsmagazine.com/board_games/some-of-my-favorite-games#comment-67015</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Mike Reddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2013 02:28:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gmsmagazine.com/?p=12070#comment-67015</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was there in 83, but more importantly in 81 when Dredd was launched, along with Dark Tower! Paco and I talked about it (and my first fateful meeting with Ian Livingstone) in the podcast a while back.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was there in 83, but more importantly in 81 when Dredd was launched, along with Dark Tower! Paco and I talked about it (and my first fateful meeting with Ian Livingstone) in the podcast a while back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
